Friday 27 April 2012

Natural Hazards exam questions and answers


Here are some Exam questions with the mark scheme after them... remember that the mark scheme shows what the examiner wants so don't just look over it..... Try and answer the questions before looking at the mark scheme so that you know what you know and what you don't know!!!
The questions are in purple, with the command word in blue and the answer in green, finally with the layering mark scheme in black.
Good luck!!!!!



Study Figure 1, a photograph of an area in northern Pakistan after a recent earthquake.
Using Figure 1 only, comment on the evidence that suggests that an earthquake has recently taken place. (7 marks)
                                                        
                                              

Figure 1
Notes for answers
This photograph was taken in January 2006 following the October 2005 earthquake in Kashmir. There are signs of the original earthquake in the background in the form of landslides of mud and rock (sandstones). The landslides are extensive, and very clear (whiteness).
Large amounts of debris must have fallen into the valley below. There is also evidence of tented communities. An implication has to be that many of the original houses in the settlement have been destroyed or are at risk; or there have been refugees into the settlement. On the other hand, several buildings seem to be upstanding; perhaps this
settlement was not as badly damaged as others in the region?
There is evidence of some military presence . perhaps to act as rescuers, or to maintain order? Rubble in foreground?
Mark scheme
Level 1 (1-4 marks) (mid point 3)
Simple listing of features from the photograph such as landslides, tented community, military lorries etc., with no commentary on any aspect.
Level 2 (5-7 marks) (mid point 6)
Commentary on the nature of the evidence as seen (as suggested in the nfa). Some sophistication of description, and/or evidence of geographical thinking.
(7 marks)
Describe how seismic waves and earthquakes can be measured. (8 marks)
The magnitude of seismic waves and earthquakes is measured on two scales.
(a) The Richter scale is a logarithmic scale - an event measured at 7 on the scale has amplitude of seismic waves ten times greater than one measured at 6 on the scale. The energy release is proportional to the magnitude, so that for each unit increase in the scale, the energy released increases by approximately 30 times.
(b) The Mercalli scale measures the intensity of the event and its impact. It is a 12-point scale that runs from Level I (detected by seismometers but felt by very few people - approximately equivalent to 2 on the Richter scale) to Level XII (total destruction with the ground seen to shake - approximately 8.5 on the Richter scale).  Seismic records enable earthquake frequency to be observed, but these records only date back to 1848 when an instrument capable of recording seismic waves was first developed.
Candidates may provide details of both scales. Detail of the equipment and technology used, such as seismographs, is also relevant. Credit elaboration of how the technology is used or works.
Mark scheme
Level 1 (1-4 marks) (mid point 3)
Simple references to the scales given above, increasing numbers of the scale, but without any precision in their use; or detailed explanation of one system only, including technology.
Level 2 (5-8 marks) (mid point 6)
Recognition that there is more than one way in which to measure seismicity . by energy levels or by impact or by technology. Some detail is given of more than one system. Also credit commentary on usefulness if given when in this level.1
Study Figure 1 which is an image of the sea bed of the North Atlantic Ocean and adjacent land masses. Comment on the extent to which the features shown in the image support the theory of plate tectonics. (7 marks)
Figure 1
Figure 1 shows two main elements of Plate Tectonics theory: the jigsaw fit of land either side of the Atlantic Ocean (North Africa seemingly being able to fit into the eastern side of the USA); and the mid Atlantic ridge (MAR) which is equidistant from Europe/North America, suggesting that the two areas of land mass have moved apart at an equal rate (sea-floor spreading). This appears to be a very clear representation of a constructive plate boundary, with a central rift in the MAR also being clear.
However, it is perhaps better to attempt the jigsaw fit using the continental shelf as shown, rather than the shape of present day continents, but on the other hand how easy is it to do? For example, where does the protrusion of Newfoundland fit . science says to the north of the UK (Cabot Fault/ Great Glen, etc) . does this actually work?
There are also seemingly a few seamounts on either side of the MAR (Azores, Madeira, Canary Islands, Bermuda) . areas of hot spot activity?
How does the extensive evidence of transform faulting fit with the theory these are at right angles to the MAR? Students may explain these.
Mark scheme
Level 1 (1-4 marks) (Midpoint 3)
Simple listing of features from the image such as MAR, constructive boundary, jigsaw fit, isolated mountains/volcanoes with no commentary or elaboration on any aspect. Simple statements re: theory.
Level 2 (5-7 marks) (Midpoint 6)
Commentary on the nature of the evidence as seen (as suggested in the nfa). Credit sophistication of description, and/or evidence of geographical thinking.
Describe the characteristics of, and explain the formation of, minor forms of extrusive volcanic activity. (8 Marks)
Minor forms of extrusive volcanic activity include:
geysers - these occur when water, heated by volcanic activity, explodes onto the surface, for example Old Faithful, Yellowstone National Park, USA
hot springs/boiling mud - sometimes the water, heated below, does not explode onto the surface. If this water mixes with surface deposits, boiling mud is formed. Such features are very common in Iceland. There are hot springs at Bath in the west of England
solfatara - small volcanic areas without cones, produced by gases (mainly sulphurous) escaping to the surface, for example around the Bay of Naples in Italy.

Mark scheme
Level 1 (1-4 marks) (Midpoint 3)
Simple identification of landforms, with no detail of either characteristics or formation. Imbalanced. Only one landform . max Level 1.
Level 2 (5-8 marks) (Midpoint 6)
Detail of either characteristics or formation, possibly with some use of supportive material. The answer progresses through the level as more is added at this level. Full mark answers are balanced.
In what ways does volcanic activity vary in relation to the type of plate margin along which it occurs? (10 Marks)
Mark scheme
Level 1 (1-4 marks) (Midpoint 3)
Simple statements of variation of volcanic activity between plate margins. No specific detail or elaboration provided; or activity at one margin discussed well.
Level 2: (5-8 marks) (Midpoint 6)
Specific statements of a range of variations. Elaboration that demonstrates good understanding of the interrelationships between type and frequency of volcanic activity at plate margins. May be use of case studies to support.
Level 3 (9-10 marks) (Midpoint 9)
A fully developed answer, with good elaboration of a range of variations between plate margins. A rounded answer with a full comparison (most of features given in table above) of the two main types of plate margin.
Good use of case studies, though not a requirement.


No comments:

Post a Comment